Unit 3: Equity
and Policy Issues of Human
Health and Global Change
Answers to Activities |
| Activity 3.1 TB in a Fishbowl |
Because this activity involves a classroom debate, there are no right
or wrong answers. Students will either defend confinement or directly observed
therapy during the debate. As you facilitate the debate, pay close attention
to time, allowing each pair of students to speak for just a few minutes.
This will keep the conversation from dragging. If the discussion stalls,
you may need to suggest points of debate.
| Activity 3.2 Streets of Hope,
Streets of Despair |
The products from this activity will vary depending on your local area
and the facilities chosen for investigation. The census variables that
students should research are provided on the worksheet. Students should
provide a clear and detailed table that includes all of the data they found
for each set of census tracts. Students should also have performed some
basic mathematical manipulations on the data. For example, if they looked
at multiple tracts, in order to compare the minority population of census
tracts with a facility to census tracts without a facility, students will
need to find the average minority population within each group of tracts.
Several national studies have found significant correlations between
race and socio-economic status and the occurrence of hazardous facilities
and others have found no correlation (see Appendix
A for citations). Studies have been criticized on various points,
including statistical techniques and geographic unit of analysis. It is
possible that students will not find any significant difference between
tracts with or without facilities. If this is the case, lead into a discussion
about the significance of their findings. What implications does this have
for the national studies that have been conducted?
| Activity 3.3 The Geography of
HIV/AIDS and Service Provision |
Students’ reports will vary depending on your geographic location and
the services available there. If you’re located in a large urban area,
there may be a large number of services available within close proximity.
If you’re in a rural area, services may be few in number and at a farther
distance. You can use the following factors as a guide to assessing students’
reports:
-
Does the report contain data on the incidence of HIV/AIDS in your county,
city, or state? Was the data well cited and well presented?
-
Did the group use a variety of sources for the data?
-
Did the group discuss the data limitations or the difficulties they encountered
in finding it?
-
Is the assessment of local services for people living with HIV/AIDS exhaustive?
-
Were all possible types of services considered, such as shelters, support
groups, hospitals, clinics, etc.?
-
Is the local research well documented?
-
Does the report contain a map of services?
-
Are the recommendations for improving services realistic and well thought
out?
-
Were students able to make links between the local provision of services
and larger scale issues like health insurance, funding crises, or societal
attitudes?
See Notes
on Active Pedagogy for additional suggestions on evaluating
students’ written work.