Nationalism Module
    Lesson 1 - How are symbols used to represent a nation?

    Lesson 2 - What are the differences between ethnic groups, nations, and states?

    Lesson 3 - How does nationalism bind people together?

    Lesson 4 - Where has nationalism contributed to political change?
Nationalism banner


Lesson 4 - Page 3

Unlike political change in the Balkans and Indonesia, the events in Nunavut have been relatively peaceful. Why do you think this is so? Your team will explore this issue in the next collaborative learning activity. First, read the following excerpt of an article entitled "Northwest Passage" that appeared in the Canadian political magazine, Maclean's.

Northwest Passage

Author: Gzowski, Peter. Source: Maclean's v. 112 no26 (July 1 1999) p. 60-3.

The native groups are in turn divided into at least as many different bands and alliances as there are languages. Less than 10 years ago, this might have been different. In 1991, even as the Inuit were pursuing their own claim, the leaders of what had become known as the Dene Nation appeared to have reached a land-claim settlement with Ottawa, and that spring there was dancing in the streets of Yellowknife. But the claim -- and, virtually, the Dene Nation itself -- fell apart when two bands refused to ratify it.

Since then, the various peoples have been negotiating on their own, some, though far from all, successfully. Because the settlement of the Inuit claim in July, 1993, the largest in our history, was an integral part of the evolution of Nunavut, some western peoples have been wondering if they, too, shouldn't be seeking the kind of self-determination Nunavut represents, bypassing Yellowknife and dealing directly with Ottawa -- government, as it were, to government. The eight claims have turned the western Arctic into a huge checkerboard. As Mike Ballantyne, a former Northwest Territories cabinet minister and Speaker of the legislature, told me late last year as the dawn of Nunavut approached: 'It's going to be Yugoslavia without guns.'.

It hasn't been, of course, and the televised carnage in Kosovo was a reminder, by contrast, of how peaceably and democratically northern Canadians are proceeding. But there have been tensions in the newly divided North, and even Mike Ballantyne, who chuckled when I reminded him last month of his Yugoslav analogy -- 'It's actually fun, don't you think?' he said -- admits the squabbles are popping up faster than anyone expected . . . .

At its heart, the struggle is between aboriginals and whites. The three largest towns all have white majorities, while virtually all the outlying communities are predominantly aboriginal, so the proposed redistribution would almost certainly see the legislature's first white majority in nearly a decade. Many non-aboriginals think that's fine. As power has moved down to regional native bodies, many whites see the legislature as the last remaining place where they'll have a voice. The natives, on the other hand, think a non-native majority would want to slow down the process of land claims, many of which are funded by Yellowknife, in favour of the needs of the bigger towns. As Mike Ballantyne says: 'It's all about balance.'. . . . .

As critics like to point out, of course, that 40,000 is smaller than the population of, say, Chatham, Ontario. But unlike many southern Canadian politicians who come to elected office with only the most general ideas of some of the issues they'll confront, most northern leaders, certainly the aboriginals, have been studying, negotiating over and struggling with these matters all of their adult lives. It's a long, arduous, painstaking process, but in the vast beautiful laboratory of Canada's North, it holds much promise for the future of the country -- and, perhaps, for an increasingly restive world.

Collaborative Learning Activity 4.1 - Why did political change occur in the Balkans, East Timor, and Nunavut?

In the following activity, your team will evaluate the process of political change in the former Yugoslavia, East Timor, and Canada.

Click for the procedures to follow. NOTE: Some pop-up blockers will block this function!

Summary

This lesson illustrated the global reach of nationalism. Your team investigated nationalist movements in three culturally-distinct regions, but which all experienced dramatic political changes toward the end of the 20th century. The histories of these regions demonstrate the power of nationalism to transform the political map. In some cases, this political transformation was marked by bloodshed and hundreds of thousands of deaths. But nationalism can also result in a peaceful (although at times contentious) handover of sovereignty.

Review of Materials Due

This is the final lesson of the module. We hope this module has increased your understanding of nationalism and of the value of geography for studying and solving problems related to political change in the world. We also hope you valued the opportunity to learn geography in collaboration with international students using the materials and tools provided in this module. Perhaps you now have a broader perspective of political geography and how people in different parts of the world are dealing with issues related to nationalism.

For a concluding discussion, please return to the Course Documents area in Blackboard and read the statement "Geography and Global Citizenship: Concluding Thoughts, Suggestions for Further Reading, and Getting Involved". But first, each local group should:

  1. Submit your comparative analysis of the causes and outcomes of nationalism in the Balkans, Indonesia, and Canada (from Collaborative Learning Activity 4.1).
  2. Post answers to all "blue box" discussion questions in the Group Discussion Board.
  3. Submit a copy of your team's three-page statement on nationalism.